Formal Letter

CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY

Cristine Malva, M.Pd.

Professor and Chairman

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, California University

21 Rose Street, Beverly Hills, California, Los Angeles, United States

Tel: (916) 554-0511

November 5^th, 2018

Alika Nadia Satya, MD, MPH.

Director

Centre for Urological Research

Summer Health Research Institute

10 Apple Rose, London

England

Dear Dr. Alika,

As California’s University professor, we are impressed by your academic accomplishments in the field of Urology. Specifically, we are interested at your research about da Vinci robot and da Vinci robotic prostatectomy.

We cordially invite you to California University as our visiting professor in December 2018. Our faculty are very exited about hearing your perspective on robotics and prostate cancer, particularly with regards to your nerve-sparing and potency preserving technique.

We enthusiastically welcome you to California, Los Angeles, United States.

With our warmest regards,

Sincerity,

Cristine Malva, M.Pd.

Debate 1 & 2

Debate 1 & 2

DEBATE 1 : "The house should ban cigarettes from the society."

Opening Government

Cigarettes have a bad influence for health. It gave a bad inpact for our body. It's also makes other people (passive or active smoker)  not health because they actually breathe with the same air (passive or active smoker). 

We can do many things or any activities to relieve stress, such as singing. Even though we smoke in the private room, it still have ventilations for the air sirculation.

Opening Opposition

Cigarettes can do for a way to releiive stress. Some of people maybe like it that way. It's also a human rights for them to choose either to smoke or not. And it had been a culture for some boys, who want to be a mature, to smoke in our society. And that culture is hard to erase.

Closing Govenment

To make Indonesia and new generation heathy, We must not smoke. So we can live healthier than before.

Closing Opposition

If cigarettes stop producing, it will affect the income of Indonesia and also people who had been working there, will be jobless.

Winner Debate 1: I think the winner is the opposition. Because they are too many people who do smoke, so it has a less chance for government to erase all kinds of smoke.

DEBATE 2 : " The house ban all pornography."

Opening Government

If we watch pornography often, we will want to watch it again and again. And it will decrease our inteligent. The scientist said that the addiction to pornography more than drugs.

Opening Opposition

Freedom for sexual nights, it should be done when you are already enough age. But it also can be for education.

Closing Government

Sexual addication is different with porn content. It can usually by child which is bad. We can take another good job things.

Closing Opposition

One of the highest in the world. People will lots their job. Porn can actually make some monry before.

Winner Debate 2 : I think the winner is the government. Because there are not to many useful thing for us to watch it. Even if for education, it won't he possible for their's study.